TRANSCRIPT:
In November 2022, an updated version of the
book "The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU"
was published by Dr. Rath, Dr. Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, August Kowalczyk and Paul Taylor.
This book not only deals with the founding of the European Union, but also directs attention to the historical background of the
Second World War and its unnoticed consequences for today's Europe,
which are largely unknown even in Poland. These are, for example, the assumption of
control by states such as Germany or France over nation states in the EU and thus their domination of Europe.
The book also addresses the issue of war reparations as well as the
duty to communicate the historical truth to future generations. Today, we have the honor to present one of the
co-authors of this book, Dr. Mattias Rath, physician, scientist, founder of Cellular Medicine
and founder of the Dr. Rath Research Institute in the United States. Dr. Rath, thank you very much for agreeing to do this interview.
You are a doctor and a scientist. You are the founder of a research institute in the USA.
You have also worked with two-time Nobel laureate Dr. Linus Pauling. Where does your interest in history come from,
especially in the history of the Second World War?
I am a doctor and a scientist, but I am also a human being.
I was born in Germany ten years after Second World War.
During World War I, my grandfather was sent east by Kaiser Wilhelm
to conquer Eastern Europe.
My father was sent to Eastern Europe by the Nazi government to
to conquer Eastern Europe
and later the whole world in their name.
Only later did I understand that these wars were not political wars
first and foremost, but economically motivated wars.
In particular, through the German chemical and pharmaceutical
industry, which at the time was the largest industry in the world in this area.
More than 90 percent of the products of the chemical pharmaceutical industry have their origin in crude oil, petroleum
or coal or other mineral resources.
These world wars were primarily economically motivated wars.
It was about the conquest of the richest mineral resources in Europe.
The second reason for the political
motivation of our work is that the work I began back then with Professor
Pauling, the development of natural alternatives in the field of medicine, was fought from the very beginning by these industrial circles.
We were not allowed to say that most human diseases
are caused by a chronic deficiency of essential micronutrients.
We asked ourselves, where did that come from? It is the truth after all.
And only later did I realize that the same business circles that stood behind the First and Second World Wars
were our, my opponents in the dissemination of these truths.
Co-author of this book is August Kowalczyk,
a late Polish director and actorand also former prisoner of Auschwitz.
Few people, especially young people, know today that Auschwitz was not only an extermination camp, but first and foremost
also a forced labor camp for prisoners that was built by IG Farben, the world's largest chemical company at the time.
Why don't we know anything about it? Why is this not discussed or mentioned in history books?
- IG Farben was a cartel of the chemical and pharmaceutical companies, mainly Bayer and BASF.
These companies had decided in 1941 in Auschwitz
to build one of the largest industrial plants in the world at that time.
Eight kilometers long, three kilometers wide, 24 square kilometers. And
they had chosen a place near the Polish city of Oswiecim.
Why? Why not in Gdansk? Why not in Nuremberg?
The reason is simple. Oswiecim is located in Silesia,
one of the areas richest in raw materials in Europe.
There the raid began. There the industrial exploitation in the interest of the chemical and
pharmaceutical empire began that would one day rule the world.
That is why. Auschwitz was a small
concentration camp at the beginning of this construction plan and only in the course of this gigantic work it became a
mass extermination camp where people who were exhausted by the work could be burnt in the furnaces.
Hitler was IG Farben and IG Farben was Hitler,
a U.S. Senate investigating committee said in 1945.
To believe that the Second World War was a purely racially motivated war is an illusion.
It can't be substantiated by anything. It was a war that
was prepared, financed and implemented by IG Farben.
For the Nazis' world conquest plans, 100 percent
of the petroleum, 100 percent of the fuels, 100 percent of the
lubricating oils, the explosives, TNT, were produced by IG Farben.
A four, five year war against the whole world would not have been possible at all without IG Farben.
The experiments at Auschwitz, the medical experiments, were not done by SS henchmen.
They were not able to do that at all. These were Bayer employees who were also in the SS.
The Nuremberg trial transcripts clearly proved this.
Someone who doubts this should please go to the archives and study these court records.
It is an illusion to believe that World War II was a war waged by a madman,
it was waged by a madman in the interests of these business circles whose aim was to conquer
the world and control it with the help of its patented products.
How does all this relate the EU?
What influence do pharmaceutical and chemical companies have on the foundation of the Brussels EU and on its policy today?
For the title of the book we have chosen the expression "The Nazi roots of the Brussels EU".
That's a provocative title. When we talk about the Brussels EU today,
everyone thinks, "Wow, that's a great instrument that has kept the peace in Europe for 50 or 60 years."
This argument is also presented in the media again and again. The reality is quite different.
After the German chemical and pharmaceutical industry had lost two world wars trying to conquer the world,
they thought about how they could still realize their goal of world conquest.
War, military warfare was out of the question at that time. So they thought about how to achieve this in an economic and political way.
Economic bribery and political blackmail.
The first "king" of Europe, the President
of the European Commission, was elected in 1956.
It was a German lawyer who was already active for the Nazis.
In 1938, one year before the beginning of the Second World War,
Walter Hallstein was an official representative of the Nazi government in Rome to meet with
Mussolini's officials to settle the postwar world order.
In 1938. Assuming that they would win this war. And this man
becomes the first president of the Brussels EU, he is the founding president, he is ten years
long the decisive figure that shapes this whole structure.
Unelected. No one has elected him. He was appointed by the
German postwar government, 50 percent of its members had their past in the Nazi world order.
How could other countries allow this to happen?
When a state becomes a member of the EU, it must give up everything in terms of autonomy.
This has far-reaching consequences. For example, if you have an interesting
technological development in Poland and you want to develop this in order to
to achieve prosperity for our citizens, you can't
because your government has signed that the borders are open; that the patents held by German
chemical, pharmaceutical, and technology companies apply throughout Europe, and each new industrial sector
cannot compete against this monopoly of know-how.
Patents are weapons, economic and legal weapons that
prevent that any significant competition to the German chemical and pharmaceutical industry is built up anywhere in Europe.
As long as you are a member of the European Union, you have voluntarily submitted to this strangulation principle.
What do you think should be done in this situation?
What can we do as the European nation?
First of all, interviews like this are important. It is important that the knowledge, the analysis, the
historical facts are provided to a wide audience
who then realizes the extent to which they have been deceived.
You can have some understanding for the governments that have signed
these treaties in the past, for example because they received a lot of money.
The principle of German industrial circles
and politics has always been to say "We'll give you some of the offices.
We'll give you agricultural subsidies for your farmers. In return, you subjugate your entire country
and become an army of millions of consumers of our high-tech products."
A very uneven game.
A deadly game, not only for Poland, but for all European countries that do not have a significant industry of their own.
How to get out of it? Information and action.
No country remaining in this form of the European Union will have a chance to develop.
They will remain vassals of this principle for generations to come.
The only way out is through independence.
All people want a peaceful Europe. But for the Brussels EU
this is only a curtain, a panache covering the real interests.
They do not want peace. They want to do business. And if that means suffering and death for millions, they don't care.
The book shows that patents are the basis of the pharmaceutical business with disease.
In the meantime, we learn something about your research, your research institute and also the patents you have obtained.
Can you tell us briefly about that? Yes, with pleasure.
Let's take the area of the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical industry
lives from the business with disease, not from health.
It's not a health care industry, it's an investment industry that is
earning only as long as there are diseases as markets. So any idea that pharmaceutical products
are there to eliminate or even prevent diseases is an illusion.
It's a business model, which, under the pretext of combating diseases, continues to profit
from the persistence of diseases. In other words,
80 percent of the products that the pharmaceutical industry sells today
are only focused on symptoms, on the alleviation of symptoms, without
actually being able to address the diseases at the root. And that's not a coincidence, that's the business principle.
In other words, 500 million people in Europe are currently threatened
with the slogan "We, the pharmaceutical industry, bring you health."
the opposite is the case. Behind this wall of lies, they bring more diseases.
In order to protect this model and to keep investors satisfied in this fraudulent model, there are patents.
Patents are a stamp on a new synthetically invented molecule,
which is applied to the human body. The investor who invests in this
industry gets as much money as the license fee this patent yields.
So every investor in the pharmaceutical industry becomes part of this fraudulent model.
And the patents serve to maintain this business model.
And since this business model means expanding, promoting
diseases, the patent stamp becomes a stamp that cements diseases.
A legal approval for diseases to continue to exist, for disease markets to exist.
Our patents are different.
The research on micronutrients we have been doing since my collaboration with Dr.
Pauling is aimed at the prevention of diseases.
It goes to the roots of disease development in cells.
When you register and get patents on micronutrients, then you get a stamp on the prevention of
diseases and thus, in the long term, on their eradication. That's a huge difference.
In addition, we are operating as a research company under a nonprofit umbrella.
This means that everything we generate in terms of money is reinvested in further research and in the dissemination of this knowledge.
Years ago, together with people of the highest moral authority, concentration camp survivors, you initiated a
movement, "Relay of Memory, Relay of Life".
Are the stated goals, such as, for example, the right to health, the right to
life, the right to natural food realized in this movement?
Yes, the recognition of our work by this group of survivors
was one of the most moving moments for me. Not only as a scientist and physician, but especially as a
German, I remember the celebration in Auschwitz as if it were yesterday,
also because we as Germans bear such a special responsibility for
what happened, for the injustice that happened to millions of people.
Out of this motivation, we then jointly decided the future must be reshaped.
We cannot simply see that a political camarilla in Brussels determines the well-being
and woe of 500 million people in Europe, but we must state how the future
looks like, especially for the young people in Europe.
There are many aspects to this, like the aspect of life, that the right to live is not taken away from me by a preventable disease.
The right to health, the right to natural food, free of pesticides and other pathogenic substances.
That is the basis. If we enforce that, then we have also taken a right step to decrease the power
of the chemical-pharmaceutical cartel and one day to break it.
That was the basis at that time. And the survivors of the concentration camps, which, in the case of Auschwitz, had to vegetate only
eight kilometers from this industrial complex of IG Farben ...
these survivors said that this is a
platform that we need to offer the next generation in Europe.
The right to life, right to health, right to healthy food. This is the basis of life.
Everything else comes afterwards. In this sense, our work
as a research institute for natural health is also part of this
beginning, of this mission that we started together with the survivors of
Nazi concentration camps.
This was a fantastic initiative. I saw that you also brought books for this interview.
Can you explain what they are? Yes, you previously mentioned the book, "The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU."
This is a documentation that anyone can follow.
An especially interesting part is a speech of
Walter Hallstein, the founder of the Brussels EU, as I said before,
Nazi lawyer and then first president of the Brussels EU. He gave this speech half a year before the start of the Second
World War, and in this speech he publicly
announced what Europe would look like after the occupation by the Nazis.
All laws that they plan, the subjugation of the people, are openly propagated.
And 20 years later he is one of the twelve founding members who signed the Roman
treaties and is then appointed president of the Brussels EU.
The other one I brought you ... Some of your viewers will say that
the title "The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU" is very provocative.
I have brought you just a few copies here. This is a book, written in 1942, "The Greater Cartel", by a boss of
a Nazi organization dealing with economic issues.
Here you can still see the stamp of the Nazi government on it.
A one-to-one copy to this book is the Brussels EU.
This book describes that there is an organization, a cartel organization, that is not a democratically elected organization,
but an appointed organization representing economic interests.
And it is elaborated in almost 300 pages in detail how this should proceed.
Why is this not known? First, because these books have been taken out of circulation.
We have acquired some remaining copies and have translated those and published them on the website of the Dr.
Rath Health Foundation, under the heading "Learning from History".
I recommend anyone who sees this interview to have a look at these pages.
The chief economist of IG Farben, i.e. Bayer, BASF and Hoechst, writes his own book in the early 1940s.
"Economic Observation and Economic Regulation." Exactly the same.
IG Farben rules over Europe.
You can find this book on these web pages as well.
Here is an official edition of the Nazi government under the title "Grossraumwirtschaft.
National Economic Order and Greater Economy." "Grossraumwirtschaft"
meant in Nazi parlance, "We rule over Europe. We are reorganizing the economy in Europe."
One chapter in this book deals with the importance of the "Ostland".
"Ostland" is a Nazi term for all of Eastern Europe.
It was a country for them. Whether Poland, Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, one country, Ostland.
That already reflects how they thought. Everything is subjugated and equated under Nazi rule.
In this respect, if you look at these historical documents, then the title of this book is inevitable.
Not a provocation, a historical fact.
But I would also like to emphasize that I could not do this work,
this interview, if I didn't know that the truth will prevail.
But the truth prevails only after having gone through a realization process.
That is, the people who watch this interview should reflect on it, should
read more about the issues presented here, should form an opinion. And if they are convinced that
what they have heard today is the truth, then they must get involved, then they need to make change happen.
And change, to put it in concrete terms and to repeat it again, change for the people in Poland, for the people in Portugal, for the
people in Italy, Norway, or wherever, is only possible through a detachment
from the Brussels EU and through a sovereignty of their countries,
of the people of the countries that maybe one day find
a new form of a democratic Europe out of this sovereignty.
But now the next task is first to say no to these
structures that mean subjugation for generations if we do nothing.
Thank you very much, Dr. Rath, for this wonderful introduction to the latest history and for the interview. Thank you very much.
And you, my dear viewers, I would like to encourage you to read this fascinating book and visit our websites for more information.
There you will find plenty of interesting facts, both historical and health-related.
Thank you very much.
With regard to the dying of no less than the whole of Christian civilisation, the significance of what happened inside the Roman Catholic Church beginning with the pontificate of “good Pope” John XXIII in 1958, is rarely looked at, let alone understood, in Protestant circles. Given the prominence – and “weight”, if you will – of the old, traditional Roman Catholic Church, these changes amounted to a veritable seismic shift, a “French Revolution”, as it were, inside the institution, launched by infiltrators and wolves in sheep’s clothings. The magic word at the time, famously, was “aggiornamento”, i.e., a necessary “updating” of the Church in the face of technological progress and massive changes in the societies of the world (this was the deceptive rhetoric by which these modernist churchmen sought to justify their work of destruction). How upside-down! The Church’s task would have been to warn against the dangers of secularisation and nihilism, rather than embracing them. And so, within a matter of a decade, at the most, the Roman Catholic Church ceased being Catholic and became somewhat a leftist sister organisation of the United Nations, with a new role for the future: “unifying” the world’s religious traditions into one revolutionary hybrid “faith”. The late American Catholic scholar Rama P. Coomaraswamy wrote a groundbreaking book about the Second Vatican Council of 1962-65, titled simply: The Destruction of the Christian Tradition. It’s a book everybody should read:
https://thecontemplativeobserver.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/the-destruction-of-the-christian-tradition-updated-and-revised-edition-by-rama-p.-coomaraswamy.pdf
Protestants came to much the same conclusion as your synopsis, only much earlier at the time of the Reformation.