JOLLY VS. HOEFLE PART THREE : DF'd for saying "No Kingdom yet!"

RG Jolly Vs. JJ Hoefle: a study of events that shaped the LHMM

PART THREE

Dear friend,

There were approximately 35 POINTS OF CRITICISM from Raymond G. Jolly made against Bro. John J. Hoefle in the March 1956 PT explaining his removal.  This study shows a grave injustice was done.  This an honest attempt to ascertain the Truth regarding what was done with the L.H.M.M. after Bro. Johnson left the scene vs. what was authorized.

Raymond G. Jolly = RGJ, words in brown
John J. Hoefle = JJH, words in black and white 
Regan C Balman = RcB, words in purple

Before we were delayed by a class split instigated by partisans...  see   How do I tell my girls about our class break-up?   and   Bible Students ecclesia breaks up on a sectarian rock...

• 
  

...we saw how Brother John J. Hoefle completely routed R.G. Jolly on Baptism in part two.  Now in part three he continues to prosecute R.G. Jolly on many mistakes, errors and outright lies.  We will cover several in this segment.  Remember, these are Jolly's reasons for disfellowshipping a brother in Christ.  We prove his excuses are woefully insufficient for such an act.

The third false attack Jolly made against Hoefle was regarding...

3. Promotions in Service

[3.] *from PT 3/1956..."It continued in his criticism of the Sept. 1953 P.T. article on 'Promotions in Service.'"  

[RCB] My findings:  "Promotions in Service"  is simply what the Executive Trustee does when selecting able brethren to serve as pilgrims or auxiliary pilgrims.   He sends them out to serve.  As of yet I have not found sufficient dialogue regarding this, but suffice to say, as we find out how far wrong "Pastor" Jolly did go with his decision making, it becomes apparent he would have somewhere lost his authority for promoting, demoting or appointing the LORD'S people to any field of service, if he ever had it.  His actions up to this point in the study already prove his judgment to be questionable at the very least.  This will be obvious from our study of attack number 4 in the next section below. 

SCORE


RGJ 0
JJH 3


The fourth false attack Jolly made by Jolly against Hoefle was regarding...

4. "Basileia"

[4.]*from PT 3/1956... [JJH] ... "saying [of Jolly] that we [Jolly] had "immediately plunged into the Basileia work six years ahead of time"; that "the work you are doing is abortive in large part, and is sure to result in failure"; that it was "a work, which up to now [1954], cannot register one single success in any department."


[RCB] My findings:  This is regarding RGJ's erroneous teaching that we entered the "Basileia" time or Kingdom phase, again proving his lack of judgment.  

This is a three-in-one accusation.  I was going to supply quotes from Hoefle that prove he was right, but where to begin?  His entire life's work is a testimony to the errors of Jolly , especially this one.

There is no question RGJ was in error on this.  He's wrong at first glance, just read the news.  We are not in the Kingdom or "Basileia" as he taught for years.  And so the work did fail. The work was abortive. Therefore all his "Promotions in Service" spent their time in an erroneous work on behalf of an errorist.

The Epiphany and the Time of Trouble are identical and the Basileia follows after that.  These things are clear teachings of Present Truth.  He was teaching through pilgrim appointments and public works that we were in the Kingdom way too soon, meanwhile taking us further away from the work set out for us by Bro. Johnson.

SCORE 

RGJ 0
JJH 4

Yours in Truth,

Bro. Regan C. Balman